Unit Errata
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
-
- Sergeant
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Nov 14 2013
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
i guess i should include this information here too...
Chinese aircraft production
CAMCO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Ai ... ng_Company production center
at hangzhou from 1933, then Hankou from 37-oct38
curtis f11c goshawk 52 in china as hawk II
hawk III http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_BF2C_Goshawk was produced in china
Gamma 2e http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Gamma also under licence building in china
O3U china had 21 of these, bought 1933-34
US Interceptors
FF-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_FF
F2F-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_F2F
F3F-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_F3F
F4B-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-12
F4B (P-12) (F4B-1's) land varriant, rename to p-12 as this was the army version
US Tactical
BG-1 was US navy carrier divebomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_BG
BM-1 / BM-2 was US navy carrier torpedobomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_BM
T4M-1 was US navy carrier torpedobomber
US Patrol
SOC-1 was US Navy carrier and catapult launched observation/scout and amphibian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_SOC_Seagull
IJA
Ka-1 autogyro carrier ASW and army observation aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayaba_Ka-1 *not modelled* 1941
IJN
B4Y was IJN carrier bomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokosuka_B4Y
E7k was a catapult launched seaplane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawanishi_E7K
E8N was a catapult launched seaplane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_E8N 1000+ produced
General links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_air_forces
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:C ... d_aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ca ... d_aircraft
Chinese aircraft production
CAMCO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Ai ... ng_Company production center
at hangzhou from 1933, then Hankou from 37-oct38
curtis f11c goshawk 52 in china as hawk II
hawk III http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_BF2C_Goshawk was produced in china
Gamma 2e http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Gamma also under licence building in china
O3U china had 21 of these, bought 1933-34
US Interceptors
FF-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_FF
F2F-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_F2F
F3F-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_F3F
F4B-1 was US navy carrier fighter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-12
F4B (P-12) (F4B-1's) land varriant, rename to p-12 as this was the army version
US Tactical
BG-1 was US navy carrier divebomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_BG
BM-1 / BM-2 was US navy carrier torpedobomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_BM
T4M-1 was US navy carrier torpedobomber
US Patrol
SOC-1 was US Navy carrier and catapult launched observation/scout and amphibian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtiss_SOC_Seagull
IJA
Ka-1 autogyro carrier ASW and army observation aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayaba_Ka-1 *not modelled* 1941
IJN
B4Y was IJN carrier bomber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokosuka_B4Y
E7k was a catapult launched seaplane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawanishi_E7K
E8N was a catapult launched seaplane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_E8N 1000+ produced
General links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_air_forces
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:C ... d_aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ca ... d_aircraft
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
This is kinda off topic but I have to ask:
How far did you got in the game? Anyone gone to the cold war era? I am interested if USSR now researches T-72 tank or is it still bugged in the unit database?
How far did you got in the game? Anyone gone to the cold war era? I am interested if USSR now researches T-72 tank or is it still bugged in the unit database?
Please teach AI everything!
-
- General
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Jun 08 2005
Re: Unit Errata
Pointed this one out to Bathagor earlier....at that point, almost all regions could research....its been changed on my work copy (and I think BGs).Zuikaku wrote: Japan can research PG Guided missile in 1936. I know that Japan's naval tech was superior, but that's a bit too much Maybe navalized missiles should be prereq for researching PG guided missile boats....
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata
No, not updated on our copy yet.geminif4ucorsair wrote:Pointed this one out to Bathagor earlier....at that point, almost all regions could research....its been changed on my work copy (and I think BGs).Zuikaku wrote: Japan can research PG Guided missile in 1936. I know that Japan's naval tech was superior, but that's a bit too much Maybe navalized missiles should be prereq for researching PG guided missile boats....
-
- General
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Jun 08 2005
Re: Unit Errata - missile PG design
Oh, please hurry it along.....Balthagor wrote:No, not updated on our copy yet.geminif4ucorsair wrote:Pointed this one out to Bathagor earlier....at that point, almost all regions could research....its been changed on my work copy (and I think BGs).Zuikaku wrote: Japan can research PG Guided missile in 1936. I know that Japan's naval tech was superior, but that's a bit too much Maybe navalized missiles should be prereq for researching PG guided missile boats....
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Oct 08 2011
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
Shouldn`t they have access to the Char B1 design though? Series production started in December 1935.
Also, are you saying that in 1936 France should not be able to start researching (as opposed to producing) tanks like the Renault R35, Somua S35, AMR 35 and so on? Even though their actual production and finishing touches happened later on, their development had already started and prototypes were available at that time. What are you considering as the technological date? The entry into series production? If that`s it then wouldn`t these tanks end up being produced in game later than they were produced in reality? (I should mention that I don`t know what research duration one should expect for these particular designs in the game as it is now)
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata
It would take about 100 days to research the tanks. They are supposed to have all the prereqs for the R35 and S35 but for some reason they aren't appearing. We're looking into it.
18372
18372
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Jun 18 2009
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata Missing Italian Unit
Italian Tankette L3/38
In 1938, a further development of the L3 design was designated L3/38. The L3/38 had torsion bar suspension and two versions of a single mounted 13.2 mm machine gun. In 1937 Brazil bought 24 L3/38s which arrived in 1938
Good one to award the Italians when they discover 'Torsion Bars'.
In 1938, a further development of the L3 design was designated L3/38. The L3/38 had torsion bar suspension and two versions of a single mounted 13.2 mm machine gun. In 1937 Brazil bought 24 L3/38s which arrived in 1938
Good one to award the Italians when they discover 'Torsion Bars'.
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata Missing Italian Unit
Sorry, I don't see what error you're pointing out in this post.davidclaywood wrote:Italian Tankette L3/38
In 1938, a further development of the L3 design was designated L3/38. The L3/38 had torsion bar suspension and two versions of a single mounted 13.2 mm machine gun. In 1937 Brazil bought 24 L3/38s which arrived in 1938
Good one to award the Italians when they discover 'Torsion Bars'.
- Chesehead
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Apr 19 2009
Re: Unit Errata
Ehrenskold (Swedish DD) has a Sub attack value, but N/A for range on it.
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata
Starting a separate thread would be a good idea but this type of content is probably more for Update 1 than for release. Most of these were unlikely designs.Zuikaku wrote:Unfortunatelly, there are few more units missing:
A7M - advanced japanese carrier fighter, planned replacement for Zero ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A7M )
J7W - advanced japanese canard fighter (both jet and piston engine versions are missing) - ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyushu_J7W )
Nakajima G5N - heavy bomber is also missing ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G5N )
B7N torpedo bomber is missing although it was operational and produced (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aichi_B7A)
Do-335 heavy fighter is missing although it's production started ( https://www.google.hr/?gws_rd=cr&ei=Pta ... g#q=do-335 )
Ho-229 flying wing ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229 )
Me-264 heavy bomber ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_264 )
I'm thinking about starting separate thread for missing units and hypothetical units that should be used to fill axis unit tree . The way it is now, German, Italian and Japanese unit tree lacks units from 1945-1960 period. While this is understandable since they lost the war and were not allowed to develop units, we must think about the gameplay and in game situations where theay are not defeated. And is , for example, Japan survives WW2 it will become very handicaped in gameplay due lack of any post-WW2 units.
The B7N link is to the B7A. I don't have details on a B7N and the B7A is already in game.
Every other unit listed here is in our back end system and either incomplete or pending some issue.
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Aug 13 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
artillery units have the same range parameter? ballistic artillery range concerns artillery pieces firing missiles? I don't mean the missile units, but units that instead of a shell fire a missile..
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata
Artillery unit ranges are whatever they are assigned to be by the equipment file.
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Aug 13 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
there is a choice if the unit is ballistic or not (missile launchers have false). In effects there is the ballistic artillery range effect and the MLRS range effect. I ask if the first effect is only for ballistic artillery with true in default.unit, and MLRS range effect is for all missile artillery launchers, not only for the multiple launchers.
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Unit Errata
yes, ballistic techs affect those with the ballistic flag and units with an attack range (not those that fire missile units only) are affected but the other types of techs.georgios wrote:there is a choice if the unit is ballistic or not (missile launchers have false). In effects there is the ballistic artillery range effect and the MLRS range effect. I ask if the first effect is only for ballistic artillery with true in default.unit, and MLRS range effect is for all missile artillery launchers, not only for the multiple launchers.
This question is off topic and in the wrong section. Please post in the proper sections and start a new thread if you have a new topic.