Lightbringer wrote: He is a foreign spy who has committed acts of espionage against the security interests of the United States of America.
Really? Spying means the transfer of information to the enemy, not for free-for-all publication. Why do not you call Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein as spies?
Lightbringer wrote:Please explain why prosecuting foreign spies is somehow "Big Brother".
First because Assange not a spy. Second, "enemies of the people" always accused of spying. Third, the state intentionally raised hysteria in the society about them.
Lightbringer wrote:Adapt how exactly? All of us convert to Islam so that they will stop trying to kill us? Perhaps we could "adapt to a changing world" by committing mass suicide?
You are falling into the extreme once again. Even in the most terrible nightmare I could not plan to guide and cultivate the American people. But we're not talking about Islam. Look at Assange: he is a product of modern Australian society, which is close to America. Some Americans send documents to Wikileaks and lot more read it. Assange and Wikileaks can't have more to Islam than the Boeings hitting the towers.
Lightbringer wrote:When Muslims kidnap and rape Russian school children, do you "adapt to the changing world"? No. You kill the scumbags. When terrorists detonate bombs in Moscow subways, do you "adapt to the changing world"?
I am aware that the conflict has grown largely due to a failed policy of my government, that officials wants to achieve their personal goals and shield yourselves by the common people from the bullets and bombs. My state with one hand shooting terrorists and with another hand grows them, and this applies to many states. So I want to say that state can shoot or don't shoot the terrorists, but above all should stop to stimulate terror directly and indirectly.
Lightbringer wrote:Are you trying to say that if Russians feel that their safety is important, they are Amoebas? Would you consider yourself an Amoeba if you wished for your wife's safety from Islamic terror attacks while she traveled to Israel for medical treatment? If she had been killed, would you just shrug and tell yourself, "I should just adapt to the changing world."?
Road accidents kill more people than all the terrorists around the world. And what do you advise a man who has lost a loved one? To destroy all somehow related to the cause of the loss? Or to adapt to the loss and try to begin a new stage of life?
Lightbringer wrote:ou can argue with me all day long about our methods. But really? You are going to call us subhuman for protecting ourselves from espionage, or resisting violent attacks from Islamic Fundamentalists?
I'm trying to explain to you that is incorrect to link together Assange and Islamic terrorists. Such linking technique can be used for anything: from beef to cellphones.
Lightbringer wrote:For the record; I did not claim that "Safety" defines our behavior. I made the claim that safety from foreign enemies is a legitimate concern of the American Population, regardless of whatever political party or public policy might have it's image damaged or enhanced.
Well, you can to be concerned about it. However in that case your concern took a shape of madness. As if after the towers you have demanded to forbid or destroy a passenger aircraft service.
SoB wrote:Lea how can you tell some one to acept the leaking of there nations secreats. Do you realy think that we bielf that you would acept your nations secreats be told to the whole world, and if you do say yes you not worthy of calling yourself russian. If you can not stand behind your flag what can you stand behind.
Do not tell me what I should do, and I would not tell you where you should go. My country is sometimes worthy and sometimes unworthy, and I have courage enough to admit it.
