SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
Moderators: Balthagor, Moderators
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
If I understand correctly, SRGW is not playable into WW2 and modern era??
Anyway, I support DLC idea for SRU.
Anyway, I support DLC idea for SRU.
Please teach AI everything!
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Apr 05 2012
- Human: Yes
- Location: Italy
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
As long as there are no big changes, new important features, SRGW can only be a DLC.
Con forza ed ardimento
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22106
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
@Zuikaku - there is no year limit, you can play SRGW into 2017 and beyond, but you can't start later than 1917 and the events are focused on the first world war years.
@dax1 - The games would get the same content. If we added something to the stand alone, it would also be added to the DLC version.
@dax1 - The games would get the same content. If we added something to the stand alone, it would also be added to the DLC version.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Jun 25 2008
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
So since I own SRGW and SRU. Will the SRGW content merge into my SRU folder so I can just open up SRU to play the 1914 or 1917 content? If that is indeed the case I fully support doing it!
Last edited by mikeownage on Aug 23 2017, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Nov 29 2010
- Human: Yes
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
That's pretty much the gist of it. It'll be another sandbox/campaigns you can select from within the Ultimate list of dates.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Jun 25 2008
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
Nice!way2co0l wrote:That's pretty much the gist of it. It'll be another sandbox/campaigns you can select from within the Ultimate list of dates.
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22106
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
You'll need to move your savegames manually. The rest should all be automatic.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Jun 25 2008
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
That sounds great!
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
What Fistalis and Kristijonas said... +1
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- Captain
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mar 25 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: Poland
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
Hmmm I wonder why this game wasn't released as DLC at first place.
Also there could be another DLC or just scenario, that starts in 1900 year.
There would be general '00 techs representing base knowledge on beginning of 20th century.
Not every nation would have all of these techs.
Also 2017/21018 scenario would be nice to represent today world.
Also there could be another DLC or just scenario, that starts in 1900 year.
There would be general '00 techs representing base knowledge on beginning of 20th century.
Not every nation would have all of these techs.
Also 2017/21018 scenario would be nice to represent today world.
-
- General
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Dec 08 2007
- Location: Tipton, UK
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
I was hoping it would be more of an expansion to ultimate, in the same way DCS world or train sim does it.
I wouldn't mind them going back to the end of the civil war potentially, a time when great advances were being made in ships, and then focusing on improving the naval AI to do task forces, use carriers etc.
I wouldn't mind them going back to the end of the civil war potentially, a time when great advances were being made in ships, and then focusing on improving the naval AI to do task forces, use carriers etc.
My SR:U Model Project, get the latest and post suggestions here:
http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... 79&t=28040
http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... 79&t=28040
-
- Captain
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mar 25 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: Poland
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
I guess if they wanted 19th century techs and scenario, then they would add 100 to every tech level, so for example '39 tech would be '139SGTscuba wrote:I was hoping it would be more of an expansion to ultimate, in the same way DCS world or train sim does it.
I wouldn't mind them going back to the end of the civil war potentially, a time when great advances were being made in ships, and then focusing on improving the naval AI to do task forces, use carriers etc.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sep 07 2010
- Human: Yes
- Location: A dark and ominous room - only illuminated by the eerie light of a computerscreen
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
So just to verify:
I have bought my first copy. Will probably donate a few more to support ya.
But for the slow feckers in the back o´the bus:
I have FULL functionality in the DLC as compared to the Standalone ?
I have bought my first copy. Will probably donate a few more to support ya.
But for the slow feckers in the back o´the bus:
I have FULL functionality in the DLC as compared to the Standalone ?
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Nov 11 2011
- Human: Yes
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
Yes, 100% same functionality. It's probably all identical files in both games in all aspects that touch the GW scenario. If there'd be a single smallest difference between the versions - it'd probably be a bug.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sep 07 2010
- Human: Yes
- Location: A dark and ominous room - only illuminated by the eerie light of a computerscreen
Re: SRGW as a DLC vs. stand alone
Yay - and thanksKristijonas wrote:Yes, 100% same functionality. It's probably all identical files in both games in all aspects that touch the GW scenario. If there'd be a single smallest difference between the versions - it'd probably be a bug.