a new study shows what reasonable knowledgeable people already knew,that thru human history there have been times that the temperature was much higher than today.
----
Another new study shows that about 1/2 of the claimed warming is unquestionably false.That one simple unquestionably purposeful practice,that of manipulating the actual temperature data to make the data show higher than actual temperatures the world over,is responsible for a hugely inaccurate resulting conclusion.
Now take into mind ,thats only 1 of the many fraudulent practices used by the agw scammers.AND that this 1 practice lowers the supposed warming from the circa .8c,to a circa .4 c,WITH the admitted error range being 0C to 4C.
So that means, without taking into account all the other hugely dishonest practices used to claim the agw scam is "science",that the supposed warming is only about 1/4 the margin of error the agw crowd admits to.....
------
Recently recovered temperature data from the 1930s ,US, shows that time period to be the king of weather record settings.IE more records having to with weather were set in that period,than any known period is recorded US history.
------
Another study shows that for the US,its on a 35 year downtrend for the number of acres burned in during fire seasons.
----
Another study shows CO2 is at it lowest known output rate since the 1990s,due mainly to ******* (shale gas). (Now all of these studies require a huge grain of salt,but this even more so.If you dont understand why,do some research on how they guesstimate CO2.Its an ey opener for sure)
----
Oh, and something to think about.The new tree ring study actually shows over the last 2000 years,that the earth has been on a cooling trend.
http://www.uni-mainz.de/eng/15491.php
----
and for a closer,the ipcc's self review found basically, that its past reports promoting the agw scam where anything but scientific.That politics ruled the day, with little to no peer review applied to its reports.Two quotes that say it all
"the lack of a conflict of interest and disclosure policy for IPCC leaders and Lead Authors was a concern raised by a number of individuals who were interviewed by the Committee or provided written input"
,
"the practice of scientists responsible for writing IPCC assessments reviewing their own work...."
Imagine that......is anyone really shocked that these very "scientists" recently asked the UN to grant them immunity from prosecution for any crimes they committed while pushing the agw scam under the UNs patronage ?