Yeah, but what standard? The UN only accepts conflicts of self defence and UN security council. The security council can easily be manipulated, take the Iraq war for example, US would of gotten a UN resolution against Iraq if people like Hans Blix would not have spoken up and shown other evidence contradicting US evidence(some which was falsified). So who/what should be the standard?fool wrote:The thing you have to recognise is that the moral supremacy of individual countries, or states, is itself arbitrary. Borders are not objective, and the will of a state that is dominant in a particular region is not itself morally correct by default. To judge it morally, you must refer to some other standard.
Libyan Civil War Turnout
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
-
- General
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Dec 11 2008
- Location: Turunmaa/Turunseutu, Suomi
- Contact:
Re: Libyan Civil War Turnout
Happy Linux user!
Links: List of Mods
Links: List of Mods
- fool
- General
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mar 28 2009
Re: Libyan Civil War Turnout
In judging them for yourself, it's up to you, use any standard you like. In making an "objective" judgement, sorry but there's really no such thing.
"All warfare is based on deception...
Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him."
Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him."
Sun Tzu, The Art of War
-
- General
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Dec 11 2008
- Location: Turunmaa/Turunseutu, Suomi
- Contact:
Re: Libyan Civil War Turnout
True, but that whats i'm doing
, I have a "standard" already.
![;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Happy Linux user!
Links: List of Mods
Links: List of Mods