Yeonpyeong
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
- tkobo
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 12397
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Location: In a vast zionist plot ...RIGHT BEHIND YOU ! Oh Noes !
Re: Yeonpyeong
Anyone want to bet on whether or not they fire on the US forces ?You take the "they will fire side".......
The insane little man is a psychopath,he cant tell right from wrong.All he can do is measure chances of being "caught" in relation to such actions.Good and evil, right and wrong,dont get applied anywhere in his reasoning because he cant grasp their meaning.To him, this was a perfectly justified action,just like the sinking,just like starving his own people to death while shutting down ,seizing ,and forced private farms to "join" collectives.
Theres a damn good reason, this insane little man, like saddam , like hitler ,are used both in likeness and for examples of their actions in testing when looking at another persons psychopathic personality traits.Its simple, the less bothered by images of the men and their actions,the more likely the tested has psychopathic traits.Jails are filled with people who are not bothered by the actions of this man.....
The insane little man is a psychopath,he cant tell right from wrong.All he can do is measure chances of being "caught" in relation to such actions.Good and evil, right and wrong,dont get applied anywhere in his reasoning because he cant grasp their meaning.To him, this was a perfectly justified action,just like the sinking,just like starving his own people to death while shutting down ,seizing ,and forced private farms to "join" collectives.
Theres a damn good reason, this insane little man, like saddam , like hitler ,are used both in likeness and for examples of their actions in testing when looking at another persons psychopathic personality traits.Its simple, the less bothered by images of the men and their actions,the more likely the tested has psychopathic traits.Jails are filled with people who are not bothered by the actions of this man.....
This post approved by Tkobo:Official Rabble Rouser of the United Yahoos
Chuckle TM
Chuckle TM
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sep 12 2010
- Human: Yes
Re: Yeonpyeong
So in your opinion what is more provactive: a military exercise, defensive in nature, or shelling a country you aren't at war with and killing four people? North Korea has no provocation at all for this. Yes, they're mad about the military exercise, which was initiated by the sinking of the patrol vessel, which according to the UN, was by a NK torpedo. Even if they didn't then they should have tried a compromise immeadently, and possibly stop a conflict before it started. They didn't and now they have to suffer the consquencesHullu Hevonen wrote:See, SK-US is using Exercises to provoke North, again.
-
- General
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Sep 11 2008
Re: Yeonpyeong
He might just test Obama and it could turn out to be a win/win for NK. Fire upon US forces and Obama would need to make big response or face more political set backs here at home. If we make a big response, the US would look like the bully again and feel pity for NK and start sending them aid anyways.You take the "they will fire side".......
- tkobo
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 12397
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Location: In a vast zionist plot ...RIGHT BEHIND YOU ! Oh Noes !
Re: Yeonpyeong
An e-rootbeer ?
All the evidence,the visit by kim and son to the art base right before the art attack, the nk drones scouting out the island last week,the nk military drill in august in which they fired shells into the south korean waters not far from the island,etc...points towards a preplanned ,measured, tantrum.Aimed at a "victory" to show the heir's "military prowness",without taking a large risk.
Firing on the US, even with obama running things, is a very large risk.
All the evidence,the visit by kim and son to the art base right before the art attack, the nk drones scouting out the island last week,the nk military drill in august in which they fired shells into the south korean waters not far from the island,etc...points towards a preplanned ,measured, tantrum.Aimed at a "victory" to show the heir's "military prowness",without taking a large risk.
Firing on the US, even with obama running things, is a very large risk.
This post approved by Tkobo:Official Rabble Rouser of the United Yahoos
Chuckle TM
Chuckle TM
-
- General
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Dec 11 2008
- Location: Turunmaa/Turunseutu, Suomi
- Contact:
Re: Yeonpyeong
the exercice is a direct respons to the artillery exchance, and why do you think such an excersice would be ordered that costs much money? how would you feel having the chinese and north korean performing military excercises just outside your marine time border? You all say that this is not meant to provoce, show nk weak, since it fail to full-fill it's threats, well it's maybe like poking a mad man, though this mad man has nukes. don't confuse, provocaton and casus-belli is not necessarily the same.
Why don't sk try to resolve this peacefully then?
Why don't sk try to resolve this peacefully then?
Happy Linux user!
Links: List of Mods
Links: List of Mods
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mar 06 2010
- Human: Yes
- Location: Hertfordshire, England
Re: Yeonpyeong
South Korea have tried a number of times over the years. It has been on there highest agenda for a long time. 'Sunshine policy' is one of those agreements. However I would side with the contrary, I believe South Korea do have a high level of 'Casus-Belli'. Since Kim Jong Il has taken power he has certainly destroyed all progress his predecessor's made. They even had unified sports teams competing around the world, just a few months before he took power.Why don't sk try to resolve this peacefully then?
I would say the South have more than enough good reason to invade, if they so choose. Kim Jong Il has destabalized the region imensely with Nuclear developments, consistent attacks of S.Korean land and people etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunshine_Policy
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AH12520101118
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-party_talks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Kore ... antagonism
Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair
George Burns
George Burns
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mar 06 2010
- Human: Yes
- Location: Hertfordshire, England
Re: Yeonpyeong
North Korea has warned that the impending joint military exercises by the South and the US are pushing the region to "the brink of war".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11844387
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11844387
Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair
George Burns
George Burns
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22099
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Yeonpyeong
The very fact that there is a mad man with nukes makes attempts by the US and SK to be sure they are ready for trouble reasonable. If NK has a problem, they should take it up at the UN. The US and SK (usually) listen there.
And the North claims US & SK are getting ready to invade them but there is nothing indicate that Obama is willing to enter into an illegal war the way Bush was so his claim just doesn't hold up. There's no way Obama would or could strike first, there are too many Geopolitical issues he'd have to deal with.
And the North claims US & SK are getting ready to invade them but there is nothing indicate that Obama is willing to enter into an illegal war the way Bush was so his claim just doesn't hold up. There's no way Obama would or could strike first, there are too many Geopolitical issues he'd have to deal with.
-
- General
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Dec 11 2008
- Location: Turunmaa/Turunseutu, Suomi
- Contact:
Re: Yeonpyeong
Maybe these actions is an escalation of the crab wars, and none of the countries seek an land invasion, but instead tries to provoke a sea war, a limited war would be less costly for both parties, but would still be a confrontation. Well, now i'm guessing/estimating
Happy Linux user!
Links: List of Mods
Links: List of Mods
- Lightbringer
- General
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: May 23 2006
- Location: Texas
Re: Yeonpyeong
@Hullu
You are attempting to justify cold blooded murder and acts of war. Your justification? A few ships and planes moving around. Not crossing into sovereign air or water space, simply maneuvering in their own territory. Do you realize exactly how insane your failed attempt at moral equivalency makes you sound?
Just because Europe and Canada et al did not have the nerve to sack up against Saddam, did not make it illegal. To judge by the wailing and moaning, you would have thought Mother Theresa was running Iraq as an orphanage for the globe when we rolled in.
-Light
You are attempting to justify cold blooded murder and acts of war. Your justification? A few ships and planes moving around. Not crossing into sovereign air or water space, simply maneuvering in their own territory. Do you realize exactly how insane your failed attempt at moral equivalency makes you sound?
Should I reopen the Iraq war threads and we can rehash the dozens and dozens of U.N. resolutions, sanctions, etc. etc. that provided legitimate causus belli against Iraq? Perhaps we can discuss acts of ethnic cleansing and attempted genocide against the Kurds? Military actions against U.N. sanctioned military forces enforcing sanctions? Human rights violations by the truckload? Three wars of aggression?Balthagor wrote:...there is nothing indicate that Obama is willing to enter into an illegal war the way Bush was...
Just because Europe and Canada et al did not have the nerve to sack up against Saddam, did not make it illegal. To judge by the wailing and moaning, you would have thought Mother Theresa was running Iraq as an orphanage for the globe when we rolled in.
-Light
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” -Winston Churchill
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22099
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: Yeonpyeong
you can if you like too, but you know my rate of responses in the Off Topic section. However justification does not equate to legal standing. I'm not even saying they should/should not have done it, just that it was not in accordance with international laws as determined by the U.N. And yes, I know your opinion of the U.N.Lightbringer wrote:...Should I reopen the Iraq war threads and we can rehash the dozens and dozens of U.N. resolutions, sanctions, etc. etc. that provided legitimate causus belli against Iraq?...
My point was that I do not see Obama being willing to do something in contravention to international law. That was my point.
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 619
- Joined: May 05 2006
- Location: Norway
Re: Yeonpyeong
Would the US even be able to fight another full fledged war? I am under the impression that the US military is severely taxed when it comes to personnel.
- Lightbringer
- General
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: May 23 2006
- Location: Texas
Re: Yeonpyeong
We don't have to go into our whole disagreement about the U.N. I do have a quick question that you can ponder privately if you do not have time to discuss.Balthagor wrote:...I'm not even saying they should/should not have done it, just that it was not in accordance with international laws as determined by the U.N. And yes, I know your opinion of the U.N.
"If the United Nations is incapable or unwilling to stop blatant, dangerous criminals such as Saddam Hussein (or Kim Jong Il for that matter), then what good is it, and why should the United States, or any nation, pay it any heed?"
@Eldin
South Korean manpower, United States Naval and Air Power. The South Koreans do have a vested interest in not being conquered by North Korea or China, I would imagine. I do not see it coming to all out war unless the North Koreans actually invade. Just my opinion mind you.
(Edit: The Chinese might be using NK as a stalking horse/distraction, with eyes on Taiwan while Obama the invertebrate is still in charge.)
-Light
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” -Winston Churchill
-
- General
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Dec 11 2008
- Location: Turunmaa/Turunseutu, Suomi
- Contact:
Re: Yeonpyeong
Didn't I make my point clear why I "try to justify" NK aggression? and I specifically pointed out that you should remember that I do condemn the killing of civilians. Please check my earlier post, the first post posted on 25 nov(according to my time) on page 1.Lightbringer wrote:@Hullu
You are attempting to justify cold blooded murder and acts of war. Your justification? A few ships and planes moving around. Not crossing into sovereign air or water space, simply maneuvering in their own territory. Do you realize exactly how insane your failed attempt at moral equivalency makes you sound?...
And if you don't know why the territory is disputed please see, Crab Wars on eg. Wikipedia. The waters where they might be maneuvering is disputed territory, and NK consider it to be part of it's territory and they would try to defend it, as SK would it's.
Happy Linux user!
Links: List of Mods
Links: List of Mods
-
- General
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Nov 06 2007
Re: Yeonpyeong
Although I'd love to see NK toppled, certainly US and SK could train and fire a little bit away from the already hot borders, right?
It's like SK and US wash a car real close to NK's house, water splashes on NK's unread newspaper and NK flips out and shoots SK and wounds it.
Although NK is the morally wrong here, other side isn't doing well either.
It's like SK and US wash a car real close to NK's house, water splashes on NK's unread newspaper and NK flips out and shoots SK and wounds it.
Although NK is the morally wrong here, other side isn't doing well either.
I cant play SR2020 well but I still love 2010. Chris will hate me for exploiting his game to death.
Date of Order: 2007-11-15 20:03
Product information:
Supreme Ruler 2010 (1 x 19.99 USD)
3 years baby
Date of Order: 2007-11-15 20:03
Product information:
Supreme Ruler 2010 (1 x 19.99 USD)
3 years baby