Unit Errata

Place bug reports / questions here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators

Post Reply
dax1
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 511
Joined: Apr 05 2012
Human: Yes
Location: Italy

Re: Unit Errata

Post by dax1 »

Zuikaku wrote:BMP-1 having much lower attack and defence stats than BTR-60PB - so AI never builds BMP-1
I'm agree
Bmp-1 has an armor thicker than BTR-60PB so IMO BMP-1 need more defence values and BMP must have more AT value than BMP.
Con forza ed ardimento
Felius
Warrant Officer
Posts: 48
Joined: Aug 13 2011
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Felius »

Israeli TN-105 185mm Towed Artillery (tech level 111, unit number 4382) has an error in the time to build by two degrees of magnitude, taking 2250 days to build (125.000 instead of 1.250).

Indian MCA-04 Aavishkaar interceptor (tech level 120, unit number 9272) probably has a wrong tech requirement to research, since it requires Supercavitating Sub Prototype which makes little sense for a fighter to require.
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

Stats from SS-1e Scud D & SS-1e Scud D-AP interchanged
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

F-486 De Andrade - Sub spotting range seems much to high compared with other in the same year and newer ships
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

F.A.R.P. Crew - speed and range are much to less compared to other supply trucks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Zuikaku »

Corrected everything for the next update of my mod except SCUD-D AP. I really don't know what that is and if AP stands for armour/advanced penetration, so I don't want to mess with that.
Please teach AI everything!
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

Zuikaku wrote:Corrected everything for the next update of my mod except SCUD-D AP. I really don't know what that is and if AP stands for armour/advanced penetration, so I don't want to mess with that.
mmh ... AP is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armor-piercing_shell and is made to penetrate armour ... not to slaughter infantry...

the SS-1e Scud-D (which was a better Scud-B) or also known as R-17 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-17_Elbrus
"A nuclear warhead was designed for the R-17, with a selectable yield, from 5 to 70 kilotons. However it could also carry a chemical warhead, containing 555 kg of viscous VX; a conventional weapon, with a single high explosive warhead (HE); or a series of fragmentation payloads, using either high explosive (HE), anti-tank (AP) or anti-runway munitions (AR?)."

or maybe just leave the stats and correct the name to SS-1e Scud-D HE
see http://web.archive.org/web/200712151411 ... 0426.shtml
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Zuikaku »

OK, lets assume that it is a warhead with anti tank cluster ammo. Corrected!
And also changed data for SCUD B AP and SCUD C AP.
Last edited by Zuikaku on Oct 23 2016, edited 1 time in total.
Please teach AI everything!
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

TPZ-1 Transportpanzer - has ...

- at least a wrong picture
- to much cargo
- should be a hard target
- have a higher build time
- should look like the Fuchs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TPz_Fuchs - because it is a Fuchs :wink:


... and the TPZ Fuchs Recon should available to south germany also (just like west germany)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

CH47f-Chinook has no tech prereq's ... so you could sell/buy it to/from any country which has just invented sticks and stones
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

Zuikaku wrote:OK, lets assume that it is a warhead with anti tank cluster ammo. Corrected!
And also changed data for SCUD B AP and SCUD C AP.
great ... would just add, that there are also other missiles with wrong names. thx :)
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Zuikaku »

merlinx_at wrote:TPZ-1 Transportpanzer - has ...

- at least a wrong picture
- to much cargo
- should be a hard target
- have a higher build time
- should look like the Fuchs
It has the same build time, but there are different number of vehicles per unit. The rest is corrected.
merlinx_at wrote:
great ... would just add, that there are also other missiles with wrong names. thx :)
Make a list and I'll do the rest...
Please teach AI everything!
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

F.A.R.P. Crew the 2nd.

what makes the FARP (527 M build cost, 24 days build time, 192 cargo + 2,5M research) so much better and much more expensive compared to the other supply trucks? ... ABS, ASR, ESP + climate control & seat heating for passenger's?
its the worst from all 3, but the newest and makes the other obsolete!
maybe it should something like a Heavy Tactical Vehicles ... which carry & drops container's (not implemented in the game) ... and even this will not make the others obsolete.

Supply Truck and Heavy Supply Truck
the supply truck and heavy supply truck should not be gone obsolete ... all army's around the world have the right truck for the right job ...

supply truck, 4 M build cost, 2 days build time, 192 cargo (8 tons per unit in the battalion)
heavy supply truck, 24m build cost, 16 days , 240 cargo (10 tons /u /b) --> it should carry 288 cargo (12t/u)
these 2 compared - you should always build supply truck's

Supply Vehicle
supply vehicle, 95m, 24d, 168c + 286M research - its ok - tracked, amphibious, airdrop ... but should be a soft target (as seen on the pic)

greets
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

SK-105 Kürassier + SK-105/A3 Kürassier - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SK-105_K%C3%BCrassier

Origin = Austria... not East Europe nor something else :evil: :oops:
Anti Tank (primary), not Tank (maybe a light support tank)

thanks aaa lot :)

... and SK105 A3 is a Prototype ... Austria had just A2 (mothballed and most sold)

Starting forces from Austria are wrong/not complete - see http://www.bundesheer.at/english/dynmod ... rsicht.php or better in german http://www.bundesheer.at/waffen/index.shtml... but this should posted anywhere?
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
merlinx_at
Captain
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 07 2016
Human: Yes
Location: Austria

Re: Unit Errata

Post by merlinx_at »

ASCOD Ulan is missing - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCOD#Ulan

All ASCOD units should have origin Spain/Austria not West Europe
SRU 9.0.73.1 (Steam) / W7Pro-64 eng
Post Reply

Return to “Issues and Support”