Unit Errata
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
ki-84 Hayate and A7M reppu have too low air attack ratings (just slightly pver the ratings of A6Ms)? Why is that since they were most advanced Japanese fighters that were on pair with Corsairs and P-51s?
Bf-109G10 have air attack ratings of 15/20 while more powerfull and advanced Ki-84 have only 12/10.
Most of Japanese fighters (like Ki-102) seem to be rated too low in air attack -especially comparing to contemporary german and allied designs. Most japanese aircrafts shoul'd be inferior in their air defense ratings which was just awfull due lack of armor and self sealing fuel tanks, but not in their air attack ratings since they were well armed (Ki-84, A7M, Ki-61, N1K, Ki-102) and highly agile.
And Me-262 (with it's 4X30mm cannons) has lower air attack ratings than Bf-109G10 which is just ridiculous!
Heavily armed Fw-190 (known as the "butcher bird" and bomber destroyer) also have insanely low air attack ratings. WW2 aircrafts seem completely unbalanced!
Bf-109G10 have air attack ratings of 15/20 while more powerfull and advanced Ki-84 have only 12/10.
Most of Japanese fighters (like Ki-102) seem to be rated too low in air attack -especially comparing to contemporary german and allied designs. Most japanese aircrafts shoul'd be inferior in their air defense ratings which was just awfull due lack of armor and self sealing fuel tanks, but not in their air attack ratings since they were well armed (Ki-84, A7M, Ki-61, N1K, Ki-102) and highly agile.
And Me-262 (with it's 4X30mm cannons) has lower air attack ratings than Bf-109G10 which is just ridiculous!
Heavily armed Fw-190 (known as the "butcher bird" and bomber destroyer) also have insanely low air attack ratings. WW2 aircrafts seem completely unbalanced!
Please teach AI everything!
-
- Major
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sep 21 2008
- Location: Querétaro
Re: Unit Errata
There is something wrong with the some unit movement speeds. Particularly talking about the AC-130H (432 km/h) and with AH-70 Arbest (325 Km/h).
Today playing my US campaign i have noticed this while moving my troops. I realized that the AH-70 was moving faster than the Ac-130, quiet faster i have to say ... I will check if other units behaves.
Today playing my US campaign i have noticed this while moving my troops. I realized that the AH-70 was moving faster than the Ac-130, quiet faster i have to say ... I will check if other units behaves.
-
- Colonel
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Aug 21 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
I noticed that the JAS 39 Sea Gripen is not carrier based. I assume since this unit is called the "Sea" Gripen it should be carrier based right?
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
There are 2 indentical Fw 190 unit designs. Both interceptors and both with the same name and stats.
Please teach AI everything!
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: Unit Errata
You could've written the unitID numbers since you already found themZuikaku wrote:There are 2 indentical Fw 190 unit designs. Both interceptors and both with the same name and stats.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Jun 27 2015
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata
I dont know if this is right place for missing units?
For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhay_IFV (dont even have BMP-2 for India)
And what about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-14_Armata
Or yankees dont like? I know they are main costumers, but...
For example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhay_IFV (dont even have BMP-2 for India)
And what about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-14_Armata
Or yankees dont like? I know they are main costumers, but...
Gameplay 1st
-
- Board Admin
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Sep 29 2008
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata
What does a Major League Baseball team have to do with a T-14 ?
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597
Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Jun 27 2015
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata
Not much, i guess thats why its not in game. Same with all the 0 production facilities. All in Russia/Asia and some in europe. Didnt find any in Canada or US.
But T14/T15 is superior to western militairy. Like it or not. 2300 T14 tanks planned before 2020. World is changing rappidly in Russia and Asia, but gets ignored in this game.
Anyway a game is ment to be a challenge and it would be cool that each country has it strong points. After all it's a game, besides it's realistic. Not red super weak so you please your customers.
But T14/T15 is superior to western militairy. Like it or not. 2300 T14 tanks planned before 2020. World is changing rappidly in Russia and Asia, but gets ignored in this game.
Anyway a game is ment to be a challenge and it would be cool that each country has it strong points. After all it's a game, besides it's realistic. Not red super weak so you please your customers.
Gameplay 1st
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: Unit Errata
Actually, it is not the right place as this thread is used to point out the errors in the existing in-game units.YoMomma wrote:I dont know if this is right place for missing units?
There used to be "Missing Units" thread somewhere...that's what you need.
EDIT: not the one I had in mind but still good enough: http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... sing+units
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Jun 27 2015
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata
Ah ok cool. The topic sounds like latin. But it's unit errors. Well i already posted my thought. If i made this game, i would be sure to get things like this updated in the game. If you feel any pride towards the game. You can discuss every unit, but atleast update the main battle units in a modern map. Maybe im wrong.
Gameplay 1st
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: Unit Errata
Actually, there is a T-14 Armata in the game but as BG didn't know the actual designation 10 years ago when they did the original unit database for sr2020, they called it T-12 Black Eagle...close enough, I might add
The issues still stands that they should have updated the unit list for Ultimate version released in 2014.
The issues still stands that they should have updated the unit list for Ultimate version released in 2014.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Jun 27 2015
- Human: Yes
- Contact:
Re: Unit Errata
See, i wasnt sure, but then its in the right place. Name not good and from what i read, even western sources say its the tank the western powers can only dream off. 100% anti missile, 1st robotic tank, piercing like no other, etc.
Gameplay 1st
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
Well, that is not the same tank - even conceptually.number47 wrote:Actually, there is a T-14 Armata in the game but as BG didn't know the actual designation 10 years ago when they did the original unit database for sr2020, they called it T-12 Black Eagle...close enough, I might add
:
Please teach AI everything!
- Chesehead
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Apr 19 2009
Re: Unit Errata
Surprised this one went unnoticed, and not sure if your still updating things, but theres some funk going on with missile size capacities for the US. Seems that the B29 (size 10) can take a larger missile then the B36(size and the B-50(size 4). The ideal fix would be to make the B-29/B-50 a size 8 missile and then the B-36 should be whatever the largest missile size in game is since it was able to carry anything in the US arsenal at the time.
- Zuikaku
- General
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Feb 10 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: Unit Errata
BMP-1 having much lower attack and defence stats than BTR-60PB - so AI never builds BMP-1
BMP-2 having almost the same attack and defence stats as BTR-60PB (which is just laughable) so AI never builds BMP-2 as result
Light infantry being far more superior and cheaper than non generic APCs and AFVs of the era - as the result AI prefers building light infantry
And ,please, just tone down all types of engineer/pioniere units!! They shoul'd be good at attacking forts, bridging and building things, but they are not special forces good at everything!!!
BMP-2 having almost the same attack and defence stats as BTR-60PB (which is just laughable) so AI never builds BMP-2 as result
Light infantry being far more superior and cheaper than non generic APCs and AFVs of the era - as the result AI prefers building light infantry
And ,please, just tone down all types of engineer/pioniere units!! They shoul'd be good at attacking forts, bridging and building things, but they are not special forces good at everything!!!
Please teach AI everything!