Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Have a feature request for SRU? Post here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators

ixonixas
Lieutenant
Posts: 80
Joined: Sep 21 2011
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by ixonixas »

Still waiting for an update. Not fixed yet.
ixonixas wrote:Baltic countries in World 2020 (Since we are making it to be realistic):

Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia


///

Allies (NATO): US, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Denmark, each other, Norway, Canada, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czechs, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Iceland, Greece, Croatia, Albania (No free trade or free borders for workers just military alliance - No EU), Macedonia (Same as Albania), Turkey (Same as Albania).

Really Friendly (unofficial allies) to: Sweden, Finland, Ukraine and Georgia

Friendly to: Japan, South Korea, Moldova, Israel (and) Palestine, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Ireland, Austria, Switzerland, Andorra, Malta and Cyprus.

Not friendly to: Syria, Belarus, Armenia, Mongolia, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Serbia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan. (Mostly lack of political approval, people are indifferent, except Belarus, Serbia and Kazakhstan)

Hostile to: RUSSIA
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Balthagor »

The relations will still be looked at but we're not modeling NATO, the alliances won't be added.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
Chesehead
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 637
Joined: Apr 19 2009

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Chesehead »

I do have a related question; will relations and such be looked at for the shattered world scenario? From a US perspective its pretty bland as the whole US seems to love each other unlike CR:2020 where a bunch of the states would fight each other. (Note: I was playing with the highest volatility and most of the fighting has occurred outside the US with SK curbstomping everyone)
Fistalis
General
Posts: 3315
Joined: Jun 23 2009
Human: Yes
Location: x:355 y:216
Contact:

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Fistalis »

Balthagor wrote:The relations will still be looked at but we're not modeling NATO, the alliances won't be added.
Don't blame ya since while it CAN be modeled the engine wasn't exactly designed with multilateral treaties in mind.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
my Supreme Ruler mods Site - May it rest in peace
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Balthagor »

Chesehead wrote:I do have a related question; will relations and such be looked at for the shattered world scenario? From a US perspective its pretty bland as the whole US seems to love each other unlike CR:2020 where a bunch of the states would fight each other. (Note: I was playing with the highest volatility and most of the fighting has occurred outside the US with SK curbstomping everyone)
I'd like to add stuff to Shattered World but I don't see any development time being devoted to it in the short term. Perhaps further down the pipe.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by number47 »

New Croatian president elected...the mandate lasts till 18.02.2020
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Balthagor »

I need a photo in the public domain that I can use the make the leader pics...
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
b52g
Sergeant
Posts: 13
Joined: Nov 18 2014
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by b52g »

The new Slovenian president is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borut_Pahor .
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Balthagor »

Is he going to win again in 2017?
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
LetsPlayViking
Private
Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 23 2015
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by LetsPlayViking »

More Proposed changes to World 2020

Added Colonies/Loyalties

USA- U.S. Virgin Islands
Guam
Denmark- Greenland
Faroe Islands
Finland- Åland islands

United Kingdom- Falklands
Gibraltar
Island Colonies away from Mainland that are in 1949
France- 1949 islands in the Americas and the south Pacific.

Netherlands- Aruba

Alliances/sphere leaning.

Alliance- NATO, Includes USA, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, United Kingdom, Greece, Turkey, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria. Slovakia, Croatia, and Bulgaria.

Defense Pact- Nordic Battle Group/Nordic Council Mutual Defense, Full Transit treaty, Free Flow of labor Force, and Free trade between: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland

Romania- Blue Aligned- Better relations with the west, Allied with NATO Nations
Bulgaria- Blue Aligned- Better Relations with the west, Allied with NATO Nations
Albania- Blue Aligned- Better Relations with the west, Allied with NATO Nations
Finland- Blue Leaning
Estonia Blue Aligned- Allied with NATO nations
Lithuania- From red to Blue Aligned- Allied with NATO Nations
Latvia- Blue Aligned- Allied with NATO Nations
Germany- Blue Aligned- Allied with NATO nations
Montenegro- Red leaning- Allied with Serbia, Bad relations with blue nations.
User avatar
Anthropoid
Colonel
Posts: 416
Joined: Dec 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Anthropoid »

number47 wrote:New Croatian president elected...the mandate lasts till 18.02.2020
Off-topic but I just cannot help myself . . . Holy ****! That is the sexiest President I have ever seen in my life! :D
ImperiorIL
Warrant Officer
Posts: 47
Joined: Apr 25 2015
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by ImperiorIL »

Some hexes I have noted to be important:

-I live nearby XY 556, 561 and there is one big industrial complex with mostly industrial goods production. Also big rice plantations.

-Chernobyl in XY 985, 176 is a industrial complex with population, shouldn't it be an abadoned city instead and without working nuclear plants?

-I've been to San Francisco, there are two major airports in Oakland and in south of SF. (More supply, more production)

-Porto Alegre in XY 557, 562 should have an air field.

-Both São Paulo and Guarulhos should have Air Bases or Air Fields at least, they are the biggest airports of Brazil. (586,530/585,530)

-Maldonado at XY 535,586 is a huge casino beach city, it should have a Turist Attraction.

I hope that is of some help.
Rawlings01
Warrant Officer
Posts: 28
Joined: Nov 20 2014
Human: Yes
Location: England

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Rawlings01 »

Is it not possible to come up with a World 2020 senario where you can turn off Alliances and NAP'S and make it more volotile?
The reason i as is that for the 1st time in the long years iv spent playing this game iv made it to 2060 and compleated the teck tree the UK beet everyone to Mar's :-) .

Now the 1st 5 or 6 years of the game were fairly good with china starting some wars but then i spent the next 34 years twiddling my thumbs and im still twiddling going into 2061.

My point really is could you not make a 2020 senario thats more random, the player can set if alliances NAP,S are on or off in settings. , a bit more violent with comflicts breaking out more often when CB reaches say 75 or 80% and maybe make relations between nations around the continents go up and down more.

At the moment even with very high volotility even in Global Crisis nothing really happends after the China invations and id like to see a few more nations looking to expand there borders.
Kristijonas
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 884
Joined: Nov 11 2011
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by Kristijonas »

There's a big industrial complex in Lithuania in/near the city of Jonava (it's in the map), called "Achema".
The complex takes up 360 hectares and employs over 1400 workers.
The primary product made there are fertilizers, but they also produce various gases and tars. It's a chemical industrial complex. There is even a hospital and firefighters station there.
The complex area is restricted access and is protected by a barbed wire. It is a no-fly zone and considered a strategically important place for Lithuania. The complex even has its own rail access. Because of these reasons I would think it is probably more realistic to place the industrial complex not in the city of Jonava, but nearby, at X950 Y128.
You can check the industrial complex on a map, here: http://www.maps.lt/map/default.aspx?lang=en#q=Achema (please switch to ortophoto 2014)

Also please don't forget the relationship fixes I and others have posted :-)
amynase
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 212
Joined: May 02 2014
Human: Yes

Re: Proposed Changes to World 2020 (Alliances, Bases,....)

Post by amynase »

The hex x:1085 y:193 in Georgia has a Sea pier but no city / complex. Azerbaijan keeps sending its units there and they can embark, but they get stuck there.
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions - SRU”