Unit Errata

[stuguy909]

You can't research T-55 model 1951, T-62, T-55 mod. 1953 and variety of other vehicles which exist, but you cannot research them as USSR. I mean after you have T-54 next tank in tree is T-72M

yes, I cannot research the next actual tanks in soviet history. The T-10 is the next tank, which is quite unrealistic actually, because the Soviets disliked the heavy tanks, and mass produced lighter tanks like the T-55, T-62, and T-72.

[Balthagor]

You can't research T-55 model 1951, T-62, T-55 mod. 1953 and variety of other vehicles which exist, but you cannot research them as USSR. I mean after you have T-54 next tank in tree is T-72M

This thread is not for "missing" units, it's for errors with existing units. There is another thread about this already.

[vahadar]

Here are a few units with "potential" mistakes in stats

tanks :
Sd.Kfz. 171Panzer Mk. V Ausf.D Panther (much more ammo and quickly build time than majority of tanks)

artillery :
T92 240mm Howitzer Motor Carriage (0 ammo^^)

anti-tank :
76.2mm Model 1939 USW AT Towed (13km fire range ^^)
A.30 Challenger (too high hard attack compared to like 99% of other AT for that time?)
M36B2 (too much ground defense? better than most best tanks of same era)

recon :
EBR-75 FL-11 (too high profile compared to same design from Germany, the Puma (intented? even better than most foot infantry), and too much fuel capacity?)

patrol/awacs :
PBM-5A Mariner Amphibian (too low spotting range, 4km^^ should be 40ish i guess?)


Also i'm wondering if the cargo capacity of planes are intented to be so low, since like 90% of the paratroopers capable units cant load in 90% of transport planes or so.

i'll edit my post as i find more

[vengen]

I was able to get the browser to work and looked at the equipment list. So, just for documentation purposes and to close the loop on strategic bombers without missile capacity:

In addition to the bombers previously reported, the following strategic bombers should have missile capacity, but do not:

B-50A Superfortress
B-47B Stratojet
B-47E Stratojet

(I had previously reported that the "B-47" didn't have missle capacity - it's actualy both the B and E versions).

Please review when you get a chance to look at content issues. Thx.

[bvb]

Soviet Sverdlov cruiser (Unit # 17233 "CLG-70Eh Svederlov") has no range for it's anti-submarine attack value. Sub attack is 440, but range shows as N/A in game, and has a 0 value in the unit file.

Unit 4199 "M-10 152mm" has a per piece price in the .unit file of 34 million . Believe it was meant to be 0.034, inline with the other WW2 era 4-6" towed howitzers values.

[SoB]

I am at 1955 so all thees are way to advanced


Japan tactical bomber AT-4CV. tech level 117
Usa tactical bomber F117 aardvark. Tech level 71 usa F4E phantom II tech 67
Worldwide submarine S-6 Seal tech level 106

There are others just can not remember but great and should insane after once it gets patched

[Balthagor]

...The CV america class has less storage for planes then Midway class...

yes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVA-58
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midway_cla ... ft_carrier

[Balthagor]

...F-102 has much too short air attack...

How so?

It carries AIM-4s;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-4_Falcon

I could change it to 10KM I suppose but that's still first hex so no change in game.

[Balthagor]

...Long Beach cruiser has much too long air attack...

why? It carries Talos SAMs

[SoB]

There are more questions

The B. MK.1 Valiant has a max missile size of 2 yet the B52B Canberra has a max missile size of 4 yet the valiant was bigger

And the Supermarine Scimitar F.Mk.1. Carry's missiles in the game (size 2) could it do this

[Balthagor]

Atlas ICBM is listed under a land launched missile, ...

This is silo launched for use in the Strategic Pool.

[vahadar]

this unit "Sub S Class" is firing at land units from sea.

Havent checked if other subs do same, but aint sub supposed to use torpedoes, thus undersea ?^^ If its intended and they use their deck gun, land units should be able to retaliate since the sub must be surfaced to do so but i guess that's not intended ^^

[Balthagor]

Chinese type 63 tank is just called "Amphibious Light Tank" IIRC.

Edit: AKA WZ211 or ZTS63

Screenshot please? Not seeing an error...

[Balthagor]

this unit "Sub S Class" is firing at land units from sea.

Havent checked if other subs do same, but aint sub supposed to use torpedoes, thus undersea ?^^ If its intended and they use their deck gun, land units should be able to retaliate since the sub must be surfaced to do so but i guess that's not intended ^^

Already discussed in another thread. Some old subs have deck guns ~ 100mm.

[Balthagor]

...Also i'm wondering if the cargo capacity of planes are intented to be so low, since like 90% of the paratroopers capable units cant load in 90% of transport planes or so...

One of the easier things to research so likely accurate.