What ?Balthagor wrote:Please stop shouting.
What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
-
- Warrant Officer
- Posts: 41
- Joined: May 03 2012
- Human: Yes
- Location: Republic of Serbia
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Using CAPSLOCK when writing is considered equal as shouting...SaudiSerb wrote:What ?Balthagor wrote:Please stop shouting.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- Warrant Officer
- Posts: 41
- Joined: May 03 2012
- Human: Yes
- Location: Republic of Serbia
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
oh my bad i am soo stupid hehenumber47 wrote:Using CAPSLOCK when writing is considered equal as shouting...SaudiSerb wrote:What ?Balthagor wrote:Please stop shouting.
-
- Warrant Officer
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Jun 26 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
This unit needs to be change in the game its a Pisten engin Fighter when its a Jet in reality.
The RAF Lightning.
The RAF Lightning.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22107
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Which unit? The F1/F3/F6 Lightning all use a jet MiG pic. The other lightnings are and should be piston aircraft.
-
- General
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Dec 08 2007
- Location: Tipton, UK
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Thats the Jet lightning (the English Electric one) that he posted a picture of, and a model of that would be more suitable than the mig one for the F1/F3/F6.Balthagor wrote:Which unit? The F1/F3/F6 Lightning all use a jet MiG pic. The other lightnings are and should be piston aircraft.
My SR:U Model Project, get the latest and post suggestions here:
http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... 79&t=28040
http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... 79&t=28040
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22107
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
but he seems to be saying we assigned a piston engine pic to some version of the RAF Lightning...
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Maybe you changed it in update 2.2 and he doesn't have the latest update (or you changed it for Update 3 )?Balthagor wrote:but he seems to be saying we assigned a piston engine pic to some version of the RAF Lightning...
I am positive that before update 2.2. UK's interceptors "F.1A Lightning" and "F3A Lightning" and a bomber "F.6 Lightning" used the "F6F-5N Hellcat" pic but at the moment I can't check if this was changed in Update 2.2.
Last edited by number47 on Jul 19 2012, edited 1 time in total.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Just checked, in version 7.2.2. before mentioned Lightnings use pic num 604 which is a piston plane as he said, while Mig's (15,17,19) use pic num 481. Balth, maybe you were checking this in the corrected .unit file for the new Update 3?
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22107
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
ah, yes. Fixed for update 3
-
- Corporal
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Jul 01 2012
- Human: Yes
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Can we get the futuristic end-tech units to look less sci fi? They look so terrible .
- number47
- General
- Posts: 2655
- Joined: Sep 15 2011
- Human: Yes
- Location: X:913 Y:185
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
I doubt that BG is going to do any changes to the futuristic units while there are still a lot of work to be done in the cold war era unitsMrPark wrote:Can we get the futuristic end-tech units to look less sci fi? They look so terrible .
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
- General George Patton Jr
-
- General
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Jun 08 2005
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
The Vulcan was one of those data base items not finished before deadline....but new mdb entries are done involving all three V-bombers,Jack8765 wrote:This is a little backwards but there is already a model fore the Avro Vulcan in the game but the unit itself isn’t, seems odd to go to the effort of making a model for a unit and then not use it so I’m guessing it was just missed out.
On another point the Westland Wyvern doesn’t use the Wyvern model and the F86 Sabre doesn’t use the sabre model.
including the Sky Bolt missile fitted version - and one specially designed for fitting with six Sky Bolt strategic missiles!
Wyvern is a casualty of not having enough BG images - same sort of thing with A2D Skyshark - both turboprop attack designs.
F-86....got dumped into single swept-wing image design, as are a great number of other early-transonic designs.
-
- General
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Jun 08 2005
Re:"fixed"-site SAMs
Since you use the SA-2 [S-75 Dvina] Guideline as an example and mention Bloodhound SAM, be aware that BG is not going to model anynumber47 wrote:I would suggest, if you or anyone else decide to make this model to apply the "existing ingame rule". As far as I see, all the towed AA (that have somewhat representable model) are depicted as deployed and ready for combat (like "MIM-23 Hawk" or UK's "Rapier Towed" for example). Not only it will look better when firing on enemy but it will also be easier to model without the truckSGTscuba wrote:I will make the SA2 (rough looking model) on a truck which can then be also used for the bloodhound missile. So don't worry about it Goats (although it will have to wait till my current model is finished).
fixed SAM site missiles; some of these would include Bloodhound, SA-1 Gammon, BOMARC, Nike-Ajax, and several others.
Only "mobile" SAMs will be in the game, according to Bathagor. In some ways unfortunate, because SAM missiles like the Nike Ajax and SA-1 Gammon were at the heart of defending the U.S., NATO and other allies, and the USSR and its allies during the Cold War....aircraft had to figure out how to penetrate these defenses to be effective (but since we have no ECM, maybe its best that way.).
-
- General
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Jun 08 2005
Re: What units do you think need/deserve different 3D model?
Sent BG Bluerints.com to them way back when they were first doing SR2020 - and looking for more - images.number47 wrote:Balthagor wrote: EDIT: also good link: http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints/
Would be interested in why they went to a French cg - but it might be a matter of copyright. Would be interested
to hear Bathagor's input......