Hardcode sugestions

Talk about on-going development of Supreme Ruler 2020 here. What would you like to see in updates or in a future Supreme Ruler title?

Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tkobo
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 11943
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Location: In a vast zionist plot ...RIGHT BEHIND YOU ! Oh Noes !

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#16 Post by tkobo » May 10 2010

That sounds good.
By the way, i didnt say the part id give is "MY" body part ,just "A" body part..... :P
This post approved by Tkobo:Official Rabble Rouser of the United Yahoos
Chuckle TM

User avatar
Ruges
General
Posts: 3407
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Location: Nearby, really I'll see you tonight when your sleeping
Contact:

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#17 Post by Ruges » May 10 2010

I acualy just watched SK load up 2 transports, then order them south to land in China. At the same time they ordered a sub, Frig, and patrol boat to the same location. Of course China had a cruiser with ASM's patroling the area which it then promtly blew up the two transports, but then SK's sub blew up the chiniease cruiser.

User avatar
George Geczy
General
Posts: 2989
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Location: BattleGoat Studios
Contact:

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#18 Post by George Geczy » May 10 2010

Yes, under normal situations an amphib assault will include support ships (destroyers, etc). Though there will be situations where either they will be unavailable or poorly co-ordinated.

User avatar
Ruges
General
Posts: 3407
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Location: Nearby, really I'll see you tonight when your sleeping
Contact:

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#19 Post by Ruges » May 10 2010

Check your PM's George. I sent you a new AIREQ code.

User avatar
George Geczy
General
Posts: 2989
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Location: BattleGoat Studios
Contact:

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#20 Post by George Geczy » May 14 2010

Ah yes, PM's - I forgot to check those :)

For the benefit of everyone, here's a few notes in the light of Update 7:

- Update 7 expands the AI response radius - this means that it will be more common for the AI to pull idle units from rear lines or farther away.

- Update 7 will also include a revised AIPARAMS file (yea subs finally attack), but I haven't entirely drank the kool-aid for two of Ruges changes. First, the AI will still issue some garrison orders for mobile units; during peace-time this seems to serve a benefit of moving units around a bit. And I'm not convinced about eliminating the "defense" AIREQ. This may be useful to examine in light of the other Update 7 AI changes.

- There is a suggestion to add a "SEA ASSISTANCE" AIREQ, which is actually a very good idea, but not easy to add ad this stage. It's something I'll need to look at in the future.

-- George.

Col_Travis
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 691
Joined: Mar 09 2009
Location: CANZUK Intelligence Service

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#21 Post by Col_Travis » May 15 2010

George, will the AI be conducting airborne assaults? I've never seen it do one.

User avatar
Ruges
General
Posts: 3407
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Location: Nearby, really I'll see you tonight when your sleeping
Contact:

Re: Hardcode sugestions

#22 Post by Ruges » May 18 2010

Anouther ruleset that should be done. if units are siting at the docks to perform an amphib assult, no more should be called over until all the ones sitting there have loaded and either done or failed there thing. This will prevent hundreds of units getting tied up in an ampib assualt that will not happen becouse they dont have the transports to perform the action.

Locked

Return to “Development - 2020”