Supply improvements offshore.
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
-
- Captain
- Posts: 134
- Joined: May 24 2005
- Location: Madison, WI
Supply improvements offshore.
Playing as the Canadian Maritime provs, I find can't get sufficient supply to my off-shore oil derricks, and one of them currently has a supply level of 0%. How can I best solve this? Improve the general level of infrastructure funding? Build a road that goes as close as possible to the derrick? I've tried both, but neither seems to have any effect.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Dec 18 2004
- Location: Italy
Re: Supply improvements offshore.
I think you need at least one active port to supply them.Kriegspieler wrote:Playing as the Canadian Maritime provs, I find can't get sufficient supply to my off-shore oil derricks, and one of them currently has a supply level of 0%. How can I best solve this? Improve the general level of infrastructure funding? Build a road that goes as close as possible to the derrick? I've tried both, but neither seems to have any effect.
Hope this help.
They are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea...
-
- Captain
- Posts: 134
- Joined: May 24 2005
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: Supply improvements offshore.
Not yet --Shog-goth wrote: I think you need at least one active port to supply them.
Hope this help.
I do certainly have ports available, such as Halifax. Is there something particular about which port could be used for supplying an oil derrick?
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 734
- Joined: May 18 2005
- Location: The Empire
-
- Captain
- Posts: 134
- Joined: May 24 2005
- Location: Madison, WI
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 62
- Joined: May 11 2005
Same thing happens to an oil field in the West Coast of Canada. It starts out supplied, but then loses it. I'm assuming it's because my minister sets infrastructure spending to a value lower than was used in designing the scenario. I don't know if infrastructure affects naval supply as well, but you could try turning up your spending in it.
-Cauldyth
-Cauldyth
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Dec 18 2004
- Location: Italy
Good suggestion! I ever try to mantain high levels of infrastructures as It's a sure boost to economy.Cauldyth wrote:Same thing happens to an oil field in the West Coast of Canada. It starts out supplied, but then loses it. I'm assuming it's because my minister sets infrastructure spending to a value lower than was used in designing the scenario. I don't know if infrastructure affects naval supply as well, but you could try turning up your spending in it.
-Cauldyth
They are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea...
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Dec 26 2004
- Location: Australia
In their enthusiasm to balance the budget, the ministers almost always drop infrastructure as a cost-cutting measure (bit like governments of the west today, hmmmm). I always raise infrastructure to recommended level, and lock it - the productivity benefits and military supply are too important to ignore.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 134
- Joined: May 24 2005
- Location: Madison, WI
I agree, I think! But investments in infra take a LOOONG time to pay off. I did exactly what you advocate: raising spending on infra to something like 90% and locking it, and more than a year later it was hard for me to see any payoff. But IIRC the Battlegoat guys have said more than once that you should invest in infra, so that's what I do!lordrune wrote:In their enthusiasm to balance the budget, the ministers almost always drop infrastructure as a cost-cutting measure (bit like governments of the west today, hmmmm). I always raise infrastructure to recommended level, and lock it - the productivity benefits and military supply are too important to ignore.