Can we have the following units, please?
AH-6 (Attack), MH-6 (SF Transport), OH-6 (Recon)
http://www.specwarnet.com/vehicles/littlebirds.htm
Stryker RV (Recon)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... iav-rv.htm
Stryker MC (Mortar Carrier)
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... iav-mc.htm
Littlebirds & more Strykers
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
-
- General
- Posts: 1168
- Joined: Jul 14 2004
- Human: Yes
- Location: Space Coast, FL
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
-
- General
- Posts: 1168
- Joined: Jul 14 2004
- Human: Yes
- Location: Space Coast, FL
I'm sure you know that the H-6 is basically a Hughes 500 (MD500) and there are 2 version in the excel files: AT & ASW.
My idea is making the AH-6 more oriented to soft and air targets than the MD500 AT maintaining some AT capabilities
Regarding the MH-6, well it is used for infil/exfil of special force in real life. It carries 6 operators wich is enough to carry a SF squad so a MH-6 battalion could be made to carry a SF battalion (understrenght?). Since these (Ah-6/ Mh-6) are mostly Special Operations birds shouldn't that fact be reflected on their stealth and defense attributes?
And here comes the OH-6.... It was replaced by the OH-58 wich is already in the game. Reason to include it? There aren't that many recon helos available !
My idea is making the AH-6 more oriented to soft and air targets than the MD500 AT maintaining some AT capabilities
Regarding the MH-6, well it is used for infil/exfil of special force in real life. It carries 6 operators wich is enough to carry a SF squad so a MH-6 battalion could be made to carry a SF battalion (understrenght?). Since these (Ah-6/ Mh-6) are mostly Special Operations birds shouldn't that fact be reflected on their stealth and defense attributes?
And here comes the OH-6.... It was replaced by the OH-58 wich is already in the game. Reason to include it? There aren't that many recon helos available !