Search found 43 matches

by Geta
Feb 26 2004
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: A.I. thoughts
Replies: 16
Views: 2908

I would like to see the SR2010 AI opponent stage actual attacks in force, and not just dribble units into the fray. Save up, stage units, attack from multiple directions with a valid combined arms doctrine. Then occasionally send in an all armor recon in force, or an all helicopter raid. Easier requ...
by Geta
Feb 23 2004
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: A.I. thoughts
Replies: 16
Views: 2908

I write computer game AI for a living, although at this time I am not working on a strategy game like SR2010. In the past when I did work on turn and RT strategy games, I thought that if given the time, I would have put more effort into "utility evaluation" of different courses of action than I had ...
by Geta
Jan 26 2004
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: PBEM - In Final?
Replies: 22
Views: 3635

Just to add another voice to the chorus requesting PBEM. While I will truly enjoy playing SR2010 in single player mode, I am very much looking forward to getting all the guys at work involved in multiplayer games, mainly PBEM but also LAN.
by Geta
Jan 26 2004
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: open beta started
Replies: 16
Views: 3412

Is there any idea yet, when notifications are going to be sent out, for qualifying for the open beta?
by Geta
May 12 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: Man portable Anti-Tank Systems
Replies: 26
Views: 6140

I agree with what Balthagor is saying with regard to the ineffectiveness of the RPG-7 and other similar AT systems when a unit is moving. Also, as pointed out by many who study the asymetrical threat issues, sometimes an "army" will use what it has for unconventional purposes. Thus, for poorer count...
by Geta
May 11 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: Man portable Anti-Tank Systems
Replies: 26
Views: 6140

On 2003-05-10 01:14, Hellfish6 wrote: These are infantry weapons (with only about a 200m range) plain and simple. Everything else we're talking about - Milans, Javelins, AT-14s range out to at least 2000m. See http://www.g2mil.com/RPG.htm, apparently you are off by a few hundred meters. If you can ...
by Geta
May 10 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: Man portable Anti-Tank Systems
Replies: 26
Views: 6140

On 2003-05-10 01:14, Hellfish6 wrote: Please don't argue with me about this. I don't want to seem to be an ass, Sorry, but that is how you are coming across. If Javelins (2 man teams) are considered AT units, then I fail to see why 2 man RPG-7 teams are not. Just because you never saw it, does not ...
by Geta
May 09 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: Man portable Anti-Tank Systems
Replies: 26
Views: 6140

I thought the Milan-3 AT was already included? As far as RPG-7 being the same as a LAW goes ... I don't think so. It has been deployed in hunter-killer (AT Teams) teams (and thus, not just a squad weapon) in Chechnya, Somalia and by both sides in the Soviet-Afgan and the Iran-Iraq wars. The PG-7VL w...
by Geta
May 07 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: Man portable Anti-Tank Systems
Replies: 26
Views: 6140

Will the Milan-3 system in the unit specs be the only man portable AT system? What about the US Army Javelin (http://www.army.mil/fact_files_site/javelin/index.html) and RPG-7 (http://www.g2mil.com/RPG.htm) systems? Will they be available? Thanks.
by Geta
May 07 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: BMP-4 crew of 1?
Replies: 3
Views: 1637

Also, I did not see the Stryker IBFV mentioned (see http://www.army.mil/features/stryker/default.htm) which was quite the center of attention at last year's Infantry Conference at Fort Benning. It is thought to be the next IFV after the Bradley. If you already have it covered in the TBA section then...
by Geta
May 07 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: BMP-4 crew of 1?
Replies: 3
Views: 1637

This is probably just a typo on the web site, but it would seem to me that any IFV should have more than a crew of 1?
by Geta
May 06 2003
Forum: Military - Defense and Operations Departments
Topic: F-5 Higher tech than F-16?
Replies: 11
Views: 3118

On 2003-05-06 07:59, Mewshkin wrote: Geta: My tone was a bit "I know what the hell I'm talking about", when I don't really! No needle intended. No problem. I also can come across as miffed when I am only trying to be accurate. My dad was a "Sarge" for 20+ years, and some of his bluntness rubbed off...
by Geta
May 06 2003
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: SIngle Player
Replies: 15
Views: 3200

Thanks, how this works seems more clear to me now. It will be interesting to experience how it plays out.
by Geta
May 06 2003
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Beta Testing?!
Replies: 39
Views: 6621

On 2003-05-05 12:51, Hanibal wrote:
hate to burst your buble folks :smile: but testing will be done on the SP aspects of the game as well actually..... nah i will keep this a surprise :smile:
I am interested in single player and multiplayer testing with a bit of a lean towards SP.
by Geta
May 05 2003
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Beta Testing?!
Replies: 39
Views: 6621

On 2003-05-05 07:27, Balthagor wrote: Be sure to include such information on the subscription form once it is available... Again, we intend to give priority to forum memebers and I will admit that there are a few very active members that I look forward to challenging. ... (gonna pay for this) getti...

Go to advanced search