BGForums

Since AI does not build any airfields I suggest that you port all the ones present on 1936 maps to the GW maps.

More guns and armor does not necessery mean better stats. Size also matters and the ways crew can use these guns.

Right now a M4A1 Sherman is better than the M6A1 heavy tank. This makes zero sense at all. The M6A1 has a 76mm gun, a 37mm gun, both capable of AP and HE shells and much more armor. It also has a .50 cal mounted machine gun and .30 cal coaxial machine gun like the Sherman. Please make the M6A1 to h...

The problem with this argument is that loyalty does not only change as the result of "atrocities".

arakan94 wrote: ↑

Feb 21 2019

Zuikaku wrote: ↑

Feb 16 2019

Actually I'm planning to remove some of the files from my mod since many of the issues they correct are now solved in vanilla game. What file exactly do you have in mind?

The file with localization - named LocalText-TTR.csv

This file is no longer needed for the mod. Vanilla file is enough.

Actually I'm planning to remove some of the files from my mod since many of the issues they correct are now solved in vanilla game. What file exactly do you have in mind?

Hi, I am looking to start a new SRU game.. Do you have an estimate on when new version of your mod will be available (with the changes from christmas patch)? I'd like to wait until then :) Hi, Feel free to start a new game. A new version of the mod is still a few months away. There is just not enou...

OK, thanks, I'll take this into consideration.

Can you just post stats that you consider to be wrong with a short explanation on each one? I'm ready to reconsider stats that are found to be innacourate.

Hello. I installed your mod and I have a problem — there are no models on the map, only flags are not moving units. Can you please tell me what to do? This mod shoul'd work fine with stock game, but might have problems if running together with other modded files. Also, some of the files in this mod...

Balthagor wrote: ↑

Dec 20 2018

This update is very SRU-centric. There have been no new events for roads in the GW scenarios/campaigns.

IIRC Brinkmanship is the scenario that uses events to build roads.

OK, so no news in this area since the last update...

At present this is still event-driven. I know that events were added but those may have all been in the summer update. There is work being done on allowing the AI to build roads arbitrarily, at least as a game option, although events are still the most realistic way (real-world based) to make this ...

What about military goods production? Any tweaks in this area since lack of them grinded wars to a halt after a month or two?

And what about roads in early scenarios (AI can not build them). Any events related to spawning roads?

Anyway, great update!

Kristijonas wrote: ↑

Nov 16 2018

Zuikaku wrote: ↑

Nov 16 2018

I chose "high volatility" and got high volatility

Didn't cosen this because I wanted new war every day. What then happens on very high volatility?

On the high volatility wars AI is just to crazy over declaring wars. Yes, I know what "high volatility" shoul'd mean but maybe this needs to be toned down. It is just tiresome to see new war declaration every day or two. In month or two time, everybody is at war. And also, please reconsider possibil...